Crushing, Grinding & Classification
1. Beneficiation Processes
Crushing, Grinding & Classification
1.1 Process Flow
Stage 1: Run-of-mine ore (18-22% P₂O₅) is coarsely crushed to -150mm by a jaw crusher with no beneficiation conducted during the process. The crushed product is transported by a belt conveyor equipped with iron removal and dust suppression devices. The purpose of this stage is to initially crush the mined large ore lumps (≤500mm) to a particle size suitable for subsequent secondary and fine crushing equipment (-150mm). The core of this stage is the reduction of physical size; there is almost no beneficiation or grade change, serving merely as preparation for subsequent operations.
Stage 2: The coarsely crushed product enters a closed circuit of two-stage cone crushing and screening, producing qualified crushed ore of -12mm. In this process, part of the +25mm low-grade gangue (ore grade<6%
Stage 3: The qualified crushed ore is ground in a closed circuit of ball milling and classification to a fineness where 55-60% of the particles are -0.074mm, yielding overflow slurry with 21-25% P₂O₅ and MgO ≤1.0%. Grinding further dissociates minerals, providing ore with qualified particle size and grade for subsequent flotation. The purpose of this stage is to grind the finely crushed qualified product to the particle size required for monomer dissociation of minerals and ensure qualified particle size through classification. This stage is a key step for sufficient mineral dissociation, providing slurry with qualified particle size, concentration and grade for the subsequent flotation operation that sorts minerals based on surface property differences.
Figure 1: Phosphate Ore Crushing and Screening Flow
| (a) Open Circuit Flow | (b) Closed Circuit Flow |
| Run-of-Mine Ore | Run-of-Mine Ore |
| Pre-screening | Pre-screening |
| Primary Crushing | Primary Crushing |
| Pre-screening | Pre-screening |
| Secondary Crushing | Secondary Crushing |
| Pre-screening | Pre-screening |
| Tertiary Crushing | Tertiary Crushing |
| - | Inspection Screening |
| Mill Feed Size (0~15mm) | Mill Feed Size (0~15mm) |

Not all phosphate ores need to go through all three stages. Whether a phosphate ore requires the complete three-stage process of "coarse crushing - secondary crushing - grinding" depends on the required feed particle size and ore properties:
Single-stage process: For soft phosphate ores with particle size ≤300mm, 24-30% P₂O₅ and little argillaceous encapsulation, crush the ore to 50mm, then remove mud with a drum washer. Screening to 0-10mm can directly produce commercial powdered ore.
Two-stage process: For phosphate ores with 18-22% P₂O₅, embedded particle size of 0.2-0.5mm, high SiO₂ and low MgO, after crushing to 12mm, tailing rejection by heavy medium cyclone or spiral concentrator can produce concentrate with 26-28% grade without ball milling.
Three-stage process: Phosphate ores with P₂O₅
55% of the particles are -0.074mm to produce concentrate with grade over 30%. Therefore, the complete process of crushing → cone crushing → ball milling must be carried out.
1.2 Required Equipment and Parameters
The phosphate ore crushing, grinding and classification process is equipped with the following equipment: jaw crusher (PV510×850) for coarse crushing, disc feeder (D-1800) for feeding, cone crusher (SH90C) for secondary crushing, double-deck circular vibrating screen (YK1860) for screening, and return ore belt conveyor (B650) for transporting returned ore; the grinding section adopts an ore ball mill (MQY4060); classification is completed by a high-efficiency spiral classifier (FG-20). Meanwhile, a slurry pump (6/4D-AH) can assist in material transportation.
Figure 2: Equipment and Parameters for Phosphate Ore Crushing
| Equipment Name | Model and Main Technical Performance |
|---|---|
| Jaw Crusher | PV510×850, Capacity 55-75t/h, Power N=75kW |
| Disc Feeder | D=1800mm, Capacity 0-100t/h, Motor Power 11kW |
| Ore Ball Mill | MQY4060, Effective Volume 69.5m³, Maximum Loading 115t, Main Motor TOMK630-30/1500kW |
| Cone Crusher | SH90C, Capacity 45-120t/h, Power N=90kW |
| Double-deck Circular Vibrating Screen | YK1860, Upper deck 25mm, Lower deck 12mm, Capacity 120t/h, Equipped with 22kW motor |
| Return Ore Belt Conveyor | B650, Length L=30m, Power N=15kW |
| High-efficiency Spiral Classifier | FG-20, Tank Diameter 2m, Overflow Fineness -0.074mm 55%, Concentration Ratio 250%, Equipped with 22kW motor |
| Slurry Pump | 6/4D-AH, Flow Q=200m³/h, Head H=25m, Power N=30kW |
1.3 Three Wastes Treatment
Wastewater is mainly generated from washing processes, workshop and equipment flushing water, and domestic sewage, containing mainly acids and heavy metals. Neutralization and precipitation technologies are adopted; nitrate production wastewater is reused after treatment. Waste gas is generated from drying and crushing processes, containing SO₂ and dust, and is treated by desulfurization towers and activated carbon adsorption; SO₂ produced from phosphate ore acidification is treated to recover sulfur resources. Solid waste is generated from phosphate ore crushing and ball milling processes, including gypsum slag and tailings slag, which are disposed by stockpiling and brick making; gypsum slag can be used for brick making, and tailings are used for mine backfilling or fertilizer production after treatment.
Figure 3: Three Wastes Generated from Phosphate Ore Crushing, Grinding and Classification
| Waste Type | Sources | Treatment Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Wastewater | Washing water, workshop/equipment flushing water, domestic sewage | Neutralization, precipitation; nitrate production wastewater reused for grinding system after treatment |
| Waste Gas | Drying, crushing processes; SO₂ from phosphate ore acidification, NOₓ, dust, volatile organic compounds | Desulfurization tower, activated carbon adsorption, sulfur resource recovery, wet scrubbing |
| Solid Waste | Gypsum slag, tailings slag, ash, scrap metal | Stockpiling, compaction backfilling; gypsum slag for brick making, pyrolysis; tailings for mine backfilling/fertilizer production after treatment |
1.4 Energy Consumption
Crushing equipment energy consumption: For the initial crushing of mined phosphate ore, the standard power consumption of a jaw crusher is usually 10-15 kWh per ton of ore crushed. Other types of crushing equipment such as cone crushers have different energy consumption standards according to their specifications and performance, generally fluctuating within a reasonable range.
Grinding and classification energy consumption: The standard power consumption of grinding equipment such as ball mills is usually 20-30 kWh per ton of phosphate ore ground. New grinding technologies and equipment are constantly emerging, aiming to reduce the energy consumption of this stage.
2. Beneficiation Processes
2.1 Scrubbing and Desliming
The scrubbing device mainly includes ore washer scrubbing, cyclone classification desliming and screening secondary desliming processes. The specific process flow is shown in the figure:
Ore with a grade of 18%-28% after particle size classification is distributed to a trough washer by a belt conveyor, with the first classification based on a 3.5±0.5mm mesh. The fine ore of <4mm is recovered as acid-process ore, while the overflow of >4mm enters the head of the ore washer, is transported by a belt to subsequent screening, crushing and secondary desliming processes, and finally produces yellow phosphorus ore (coarse particle size) and acid-process ore (fine particle size) with a grade of 28%.
Figure 4: Phosphate Ore Scrubbing and Desliming Process Flow
| Run-of-Mine Ore | |
| Ore Washer Scrubbing | |
| >4mm | <4mm |
| Screening & Secondary Desliming | Cyclone Classification Desliming |
| Yellow Phosphorus Ore + Acid-Process Ore | >19μm: Acid-Process Ore <19μm: Final Tailings + Ore Slime |
The core equipment for the scrubbing and desliming stage includes 9 sets in total: trough washer (2200×8400) for high-intensity scrubbing, linear screen (2SUL1.5×3.0AT) for wet screening classification, three-stage cyclone group (Φ350×4, Φ200×7, Φ125×15) for step-by-step desliming, 1# and 2# dewatering screens for dewatering to obtain concentrate, thickener plus 6 sets of filter presses for treating ore slime water and recycling water for circulation.
Figure 5: Main Equipment for Scrubbing Stage
| Main Equipment | Parameters |
|---|---|
| Trough Washer | 2200×8400 |
| Linear Screen | 2SUL1.5×3.0AT |
| 1st-stage Cyclone | Φ350×4 |
| 2nd-stage Cyclone | Φ200×7 |
| 3rd-stage Cyclone | Φ125×15 |
| 1# Dewatering Screen | GT1230 |
| 2# Dewatering Screen | GT1836 |
| Belt Conveyor | TD75-6550 |
| Thickener | NT-301 |
| Filter Press | B-A-60 |
All three wastes generated in the phosphate ore scrubbing and desliming stage are recycled or disposed of on-site in compliance with environmental requirements: scrubbing wastewater is reused after precipitation with no process wastewater discharged; tailings are sent to a dry stockpile, and leachate is also reused after precipitation; unorganized dust is controlled by water sprinkling for dust suppression; equipment noise is mitigated by shock absorption and noise elimination measures; solid waste and domestic garbage are stockpiled separately or sent to a garbage treatment station.
Figure 6: Three Wastes Discharge of Scrubbing and Desliming Method
| Content | Pollution Source | Pollutant Name | Treatment Requirements & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waste Gas | Unorganized dust from raw material yard, product yard, solid waste yard, on-site roads, material handling and transportation | Dust | Water sprinkling for dust suppression |
| Wastewater | Scrubbing process wastewater, tailings dry stockpile leachate, domestic sewage from living facilities | COD, BOD, NH3-N, SS | Reused for production process after treatment |
| Noise | Crushing, screening and other equipment in the scrubbing section | Noise | Shock absorption and noise elimination measures |
| Solid Waste | Tailings from scrubbing process, domestic garbage from living facilities | Tailings, domestic garbage | Tailings stockpiled in dry stockpile; garbage sent to treatment station |
2.2 Heavy Medium Beneficiation
To avoid the decrease in separation efficiency and increase in cost caused by fine particles, only the coarse fraction of low-grade collophane enters heavy medium separation after crushing and screening. After screening, the oversize material (+8mm) enters a pressureless three-product heavy medium cyclone for separation. In the first stage of separation (the ore feeding point), the separation density is generally controlled at about 2.80g/cm³, and the rejected tailings are low-density shale; the second-stage separation system realizes stepless online adjustment, concentrating the heavy medium again to form a separation density of 2.90g/cm³, separating apatite bands from dolomite bands with a slight density difference of 2.80~2.90g/cm³. The heavy medium concentrate and tailings are demediated by a demediation screen to become final concentrate and tailings; the tailings are screened again to obtain ore sand with about 20% P₂O₅, which is combined with the undersize material of the original ore for product recovery.
Figure 7: Heavy Medium Beneficiation Process Flow
| Run-of-Mine Ore |
| Crushing & Screening |
| >8mm Oversize / <8mm Undersize |
| Pressureless Three-Product Heavy Medium Cyclone Separation |
| 1st Stage (2.80g/cm³): Low-density Shale Tailings |
| 2nd Stage (2.90g/cm³): Apatite Concentrate + Dolomite Tailings |
| Demediation |
| Final Concentrate + Tailings |
| Tailings Re-screening |
| 20% P₂O₅ Ore Sand + Original Ore Undersize |
| Combined Product Recovery |
Figure 8: Ore and Medium Properties
| Index | Content/Parameter |
|---|---|
| Ore Type | Phosphate Ore |
| Useful Mineral | Apatite |
| Gangue Mineral | Dolomite, Mica, Feldspar |
| Particle Size /mm | 20-1 |
| Heavy Medium Separation Equipment | Pressureless Feeding Three-Product Heavy Medium Cyclone |
| Medium Property | Weighting Agent: Magnetite |
| Density /(g·cm⁻³): 5.0 | |
| Heavy Medium Suspension Specific Gravity: 2.49 |
The core of the phosphate ore heavy medium beneficiation stage is to separate apatite from dolomite within a narrow density window of 2.80-2.92g/cm³. The key equipment is a pressureless three-product heavy medium cyclone group (Φ600-Φ750mm, 60-120t/h), supported by -0.045mm magnetite powder weighting agent, demediation curved screen, 180mT double-drum magnetic separator, FB-2300 nuclear density meter automatic density control system, as well as qualified/dilute medium pumps and pre-screening crushing circuit, ensuring concentrate P₂O₅>28.4%, tailings ≤10%, comprehensive recovery rate over 83%, and medium consumption<0.5kg>
Figure 9: Equipment and Parameters for Heavy Medium Beneficiation
| Equipment/Performance Index | Parameters/Indicators |
|---|---|
| Pressureless Three-Product Heavy Medium Cyclone Group | Φ600-Φ750mm, Processing Capacity 60-120t/h |
| Weighting Agent | Magnetite powder, -0.045mm |
| Demediation Equipment | Demediation curved screen |
| Magnetic Separator | 180mT double-drum magnetic separator |
| Density Control System | FB-2300 nuclear density meter automatic density control system |
| Pumps | Qualified/dilute medium pumps |
| Auxiliary Circuit | Pre-screening crushing circuit |
| Concentrate P₂O₅ | >28.4% |
| Tailings P₂O₅ | ≤10% |
| Comprehensive Recovery Rate | >83% |
| Medium Consumption | <0.5kg/t |
- Wastewater: Derived from medium circulation fluid and demediation flushing water, recycled after step-by-step neutralization for heavy metal removal and precipitation-biochemical degradation of organic matter (circulation rate >90%), meeting discharge standards;
- Solid Waste: Including beneficiation underflow and filter press residue, the medium is recovered by magnetic separation (recovery rate >98%), tailings are stockpiled or resourcefully utilized (e.g., water glass production, backfilling) after thickening and filter pressing (moisture content<12%);
- Waste Gas (Dust): Originating from crushing and screening processes, controlled by bag dust removal + wet spray dust suppression and closed pipeline system, with dust emission ≤10mg/m³, complying with environmental requirements.
Figure 10: Three Wastes of Heavy Medium Beneficiation
| Process Key Points | Waste Type | Treatment Measures | Typical Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water Treatment | Wastewater | Step-by-step neutralization for heavy metal removal; precipitation-biochemical treatment for organic matter; closed circulation | Circulation rate >90%; treated water meets direct discharge standards |
| Medium Recovery & Solid Waste Disposal | Solid Waste | Magnetic separation for medium recovery (>98%); tailings thickening & filter pressing (moisture <12%); resource utilization | Medium almost fully recovered and reusable; tailings for water glass production/backfilling |
| Dust Control | Waste Gas (Dust) | Bag dust removal + wet spray dust suppression; closed pipeline system | Dust emission ≤10mg/m³, meeting Mining Industry Air Pollutant Emission Standards |
2.3 Flotation
Flotation is the most widely used technology in phosphate ore beneficiation. Flotation processes are divided into direct flotation, reverse flotation and two-stage flotation (direct-reverse flotation, reverse-direct flotation and double reverse flotation).
Direct Flotation: Phosphate ore direct flotation is carried out under alkaline conditions (pH 9-10), mostly using depressants to inhibit silicate gangue minerals, thereby separating to obtain the target mineral phosphate concentrate with a relatively simple process flow.
Single Reverse Flotation: Single reverse flotation usually requires adjusting the slurry pH to 4-6; after adding phosphate mineral depressants, anionic collectors are used to float carbonate gangue minerals to reduce the Mg content of phosphate concentrate. This process is simple and low-cost with mature industrial production technology, and is mostly suitable for the flotation of calcareous phosphate ores.
Two-stage Flotation: Two-stage flotation adopts different reagents in different media to remove silicon and reduce magnesium, with common processes including direct-reverse flotation, double reverse flotation and reverse-direct flotation. The direct-reverse flotation process is more complex than direct flotation and single reverse flotation, with more types and larger dosage of flotation reagents, resulting in higher beneficiation costs; however, it has strong adaptability and is conducive to the recovery of low-grade ores. Reverse-direct flotation is often used for the beneficiation of silicon-calcium mixed collophane.
Figure 11: Direct and Reverse Flotation Process Flows
| Direct Flotation Process | Reverse Flotation Process |
| Ore Slurry | Ore Slurry |
| pH Adjustment (pH 9-10, Alkaline) | pH Adjustment (pH 4-6, Acidic) |
| Depressant Addition (Silicate Inhibition) | Phosphate Depressant Addition |
| Flotation | Anionic Collector Addition |
| Phosphate Concentrate + Silicate Tailings | Flotation |
| - | Phosphate Concentrate + Carbonate Tailings |
Figure 12: Three Double Flotation Process Flows
| 1. Direct-Reverse Flotation | 2. Reverse-Direct Flotation | 3. Double Reverse Flotation |
| Ore Slurry | Ore Slurry | Ore Slurry |
| Alkaline Direct Flotation (Silicon Removal) | Acidic Reverse Flotation (Magnesium Removal) | 1st Acidic Reverse Flotation (Carbonate Removal) |
| Concentrate | Concentrate | Concentrate |
| Acidic Reverse Flotation (Magnesium Removal) | Alkaline Direct Flotation (Silicon Removal) | 2nd Acidic Reverse Flotation (Silicate Removal) |
| High-Grade Phosphate Concentrate | High-Grade Phosphate Concentrate | High-Grade Phosphate Concentrate |
Figure 13: Comparison of Five Flotation Types
| Flotation Type | pH Condition | Reagent Type | Separation Target | Process Complexity | Adaptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Flotation | Alkaline (9-10) | Silicate depressant, phosphate collector | Remove silicate gangue | Simple | Calcareous phosphate ore with low silicon |
| Single Reverse Flotation | Acidic (4-6) | Phosphate depressant, carbonate anionic collector | Remove carbonate gangue | Simple | Phosphate ore with high magnesium |
| Direct-Reverse Flotation | Alkaline → Acidic | Multiple depressants/collectors | Remove silicon then magnesium | Moderate | Phosphate ore with high silicon and magnesium |
| Reverse-Direct Flotation | Acidic → Alkaline | Multiple depressants/collectors | Remove magnesium then silicon | Moderate | Silicon-calcium mixed collophane |
| Double Reverse Flotation | Acidic → Acidic | Specialized depressants/collectors | Remove carbonate then silicate | Complex | Low-grade phosphate ore with high silicon and magnesium |
The main equipment (flotation machine, thickener, filter press) is basically the same for the five processes, but the number of flotation stages in the process flow determines the number of flotation machines required and the complexity of the pH adjustment circuit and reagent preparation system. Direct-reverse, reverse-direct and double reverse flotation require two to three stages of flotation, with corresponding additional capital investment of about 30-50% in pipelines, pump stations and control systems.
Figure 14: Equipment and Parameters for Five Flotation Methods
| Flotation Type | Main Equipment | Auxiliary Systems | Capital Investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Flotation | Single-stage flotation machine, thickener, filter press | Single alkaline pH adjustment circuit, simple reagent preparation system | Basic |
| Single Reverse Flotation | Single-stage flotation machine, thickener, filter press | Single acidic pH adjustment circuit, ordinary reagent preparation system | Basic + 10% |
| Direct-Reverse/Reverse-Direct | Two-stage flotation machine, thickener, filter press | Dual acid-alkali pH adjustment circuit, multi-type reagent preparation system | Basic + 30-40% |
| Double Reverse Flotation | Three-stage flotation machine, thickener, filter press | Dual acidic pH adjustment circuit, specialized reagent preparation system, multi-stage acid removal system | Basic + 40-50% |
As the flotation process progresses from "direct → reverse → direct-reverse/reverse-direct → double reverse", the amount of three wastes and treatment complexity increase step by step: direct flotation only produces alkaline wastewater and low-silicon tailings with the simplest treatment; reverse flotation requires neutralization and acid removal towers due to acid usage; direct-reverse/reverse-direct flotation produces two-stage alkaline and acidic wastewater and two types of tailings, requiring a double neutralization system with a treatment load 1.5-2 times that of direct flotation; double reverse flotation involves acid addition twice in succession, generating the largest amount of waste gas that requires multi-stage acid removal; the wastewater has the highest chemical oxygen demand and suspended solids; the total amount of three types of tailings is the largest but the MgO and SiO₂ content of the slag has been greatly reduced, which is more conducive to subsequent safe landfilling or filling, resulting in the highest overall environmental protection investment.
Figure 15: Three Wastes of Five Flotation Types
| Waste Type | Direct Flotation | Reverse Flotation | Direct-Reverse/Reverse-Direct | Double Reverse Flotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste Gas | No acid waste gas; only dust, simple control | Acid mist, SO₂, NOₓ; need single acid removal tower | Acid-alkali waste gas; need double acid removal system | Largest amount of acid waste gas; need multi-stage acid removal |
| Wastewater | Alkaline wastewater, low COD/SS; simple neutralization | Acidic wastewater; neutralization + biochemical treatment | Acid-alkali two-stage wastewater; double neutralization system, 1.5-2x load of direct flotation | Highest COD/SS; multi-stage neutralization + biochemical treatment + ion exchange |
| Solid Waste | Low-silicon tailings, small volume | Calcareous tailings, moderate volume | Two types of tailings, 1.5x volume of direct flotation | Three types of tailings, largest volume; high MgO/SiO₂ removal rate, suitable for safe landfilling/resource utilization |
The increase in energy consumption mainly comes from longer flotation operation time, additional reagent addition, and secondary grinding required in some processes. Therefore, the more complex the process, the higher the power consumption per unit output.
Figure 16: Energy Consumption of Different Flotation Processes
| Process | Typical Power Consumption (kWh/ton of raw ore) | Influencing Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Flotation | 30-35 | Single-stage flotation, compressed air, grinding consumption |
| Reverse Flotation | 35-40 | Additional reagent addition, acid heating (if needed) |
| Direct-Reverse/Reverse-Direct | 45-55 | Two-stage flotation, possible secondary grinding, more pumps, longer air compressor operation time |
| Double Reverse Flotation | 50-60 (highest) | Three-stage flotation, double acid addition, secondary grinding, highest compressed air demand |

2.4 Comparison of Beneficiation Processes
Scrubbing and Desliming: Treats argillaceous weathered phosphate ores through scrubbing, desliming and screening classification, with simple process, open-air production and no reagent pollution, but low phosphate concentrate grade and recovery rate.
Heavy Medium Beneficiation: Uses heavy medium cyclones as separation equipment and magnetite as weighting agent, adopting the process of ore washing and desliming + one roughing and one cleaning, with low pollution and good beneficiation indicators for coarse-grained phosphate ores, but not suitable for fine-grained embedded phosphate ores.
Flotation: Includes various processes such as direct flotation and reverse flotation, being the main method for phosphate ore beneficiation, suitable for complex and refractory phosphate ores with good product indicators.
Figure 17: Application Scope, Advantages and Disadvantages of Three Beneficiation Processes
| Beneficiation Process | Process and Application Scope | Advantages & Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Scrubbing and Desliming | Scrubbing, desliming and screening classification for argillaceous, weathered phosphate ores with high mud content | Advantages: Simple process, open-air production, no chemical reagent pollution, low environmental impact; Disadvantages: Low concentrate grade and recovery rate |
| Heavy Medium Beneficiation | Ore washing and desliming + one roughing and one cleaning heavy medium separation process with heavy medium cyclone as core equipment and magnetite as weighting agent | Advantages: Low pollution, good beneficiation indicators for coarse-grained phosphate ores; Disadvantages: Not suitable for fine-grained embedded phosphate ores |
| Flotation | Includes direct flotation, reverse flotation, direct-reverse flotation, reverse-direct flotation and double reverse flotation; main beneficiation method for phosphate ore, suitable for complex and refractory phosphate ores | Advantages: Strong adaptability, good product indicators; Disadvantages: Complex two-stage process, high reagent and environmental protection investment |
2.5 Performance Indicators
Phosphate ore flotation product: P₂O₅ (dry basis) 29%-35% (up to 36%-38% for direct-reverse and other processes), MgO removal rate 85% (0.6%-1.0%), SiO₂ can be reduced to ≤0.5%, particle size 5-50mm, moisture content 10%-12%.
Raw material for yellow phosphorus (electric furnace method): Requires P₂O₅≥30%, MgO≤2%, SiO₂/CaO ≤0.2 (SiO₂ usually ≤5%), F≤0.5%, etc., with the same particle size as flotation products.
Raw material for wet-process phosphoric acid: Requires P₂O₅≥28% (high grade can reduce acid consumption), MgO≤2%, SiO₂<5%, etc..>
Figure 18: Performance Indicators of Beneficiated Phosphate Ore
| Product Type | P₂O₅ (Dry Basis) | MgO Content | MgO Removal Rate | SiO₂ Content | Particle Size (mm) | Moisture Content | Other Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphate Ore Flotation Product | 29%-35% (up to 36%-38% for two-stage flotation) | 0.6%-1.0% | 85% | ≤0.5% | 5-50 | 10%-12% | - |
| Yellow Phosphorus Raw Material (Electric Furnace Method) | ≥30% | ≤2% | - | ≤5% (SiO₂/CaO ≤0.2) | 5-50 | 10%-12% | F ≤0.5% |
| Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid Raw Material | ≥28% | ≤2% | - | <5% | 5-50 | ≤5% (Dry Basis) | - |
